ORIGINAL CONTRIBUTION
    
PDF of Article    Article Full Text 

Home
Journal
Now in Medline / Index Medicus & ISI



Subscribe
Search
Discussion Forums
Join
Multimedia
Meeting Highlights
Lecture Presentations
Surgical Video Library
Private Lecture Series
Audio Interviews
Resources
Medline
Learning Center
Meetings
For Authors
Editorial Board
Sponsors
More Sponsors

Site News
Sign up for our newsletter:





Comparison of Minithoracotomy With Conventional Sternotomy Methods in Valve Surgery

(#2000-45956 ... June 8, 2000)

Tufan Sener, Hakan Gerçekoglu, Serdar Evrenkaya, Bige Aydin, Serdar Çimen, Murat Demirtas, Remzi Tosun, Ergin Eren, Azmi Özler

Department of Cardiovascular Surgery, Siyami Ersek Cardiovascular and Thoracic Surgery Center, Istanbul, Turkey



ABSTRACT


Background: To determine the differences in the operative findings between the two groups of patients who had undergone either minithoracotomy or conventional sternotomy.

Methods: We compared 12 valve operations that were performed in our clinic with minithoracotomy (group I) between January 1997 and November 1999 with 13 valve operations that were performed with conventional median sternotomy (group II) in the same period in regard to preoperative, perioperative and postoperative variables, retrospectively. Preoperative variables were age, sex, bleeding time, clotting time, platelet count, and additional diseases like diabetes mellitus, hypertension, etc. Perioperative variables were extracorporeal circulation (ECC) time, cross-clamp (CC) time, and operation time. Postoperative variables were mechanical ventilation period, stay in the postoperative intensive care unit and hospital, mediastinal drainage amount, the amount of blood and blood products for transfusions, and costs. Group I consist of six mitral valve replacements (MVRs), three aortic valve replacements (AVRs), one aortic valve replacement combined with mitral valvuloplasty, and two tricuspid valve replacements (TVRs). Group II consist of nine MVRs and four AVRs.

Results: Statistical results are given with mean standard error (SEM) deviations. There were significant differences between the two groups in respect to operation time (in group I, mean operation time was 328 ± SEM 22 minutes in group II, 271 ± SEM 14 minutes (p < 0.04)); mediastinal drainage (in group I, mean drainage time was 283 ± SEM 57 cc/m2, in group II, 490 ± SEM 74 cc/m2 (p < 0.04)); and amounts of transfused blood and blood products (in group I, mean transfused blood products amount was 375 ± SEM 115 cc/m2, in group II, 874 ± SEM 184 cc/m2 (p < 0.03)).

Conclusion: The operation times are apparently longer in the minithoracotomy group. On the other hand, less mediastinal drainage occurred and less blood and blood products transfusion needs were determined to exist in the minithoracotomy group.



AUTHOR/ARTICLE INFORMATION


Presented at the Third Annual Meeting of the International Society for Minimally Invasive Cardiac Surgery, Atlanta, Georgia, June 8-10, 2000

Address correspondence and reprint requests to: Hakan Gercekoglu, Tunek Sk.No:23 Sozen Apt. 7/32 81080 Goztepe Istanbul, Turkey, Phone: 90 216 3688574, Fax: 90 216 3379719, Email: hakangercekoglu@siyami-ersek.com

 


ISSN#: 1522-6662
Copyright 2008 Forum Multimedia Publishing, LLC. All rights reserved.

The material available at this site is for educational purposes only and is NOT intended for any diagnostic, clinically related, or other purpose. Forum Multimedia Publishing, LLC, assumes no responsibility for any use or misuse of this material and makes no warranty or representation of any kind with respect to the material available at this site.