|
 |
 Xyphoid MIDCAB: Report of the technique and experience with a less invasive MIDCAB procedure
(#1999-2438 ... March 8, 1999)
Mercedes K.C. Dullum, MD,1 Jill Block, RN, CSA,1 Anjum Qazi, MD,1 Fayaz Shawl, MD,1 Frederico Benetti, MD,2
1 Washington Hospital Center, Washington Adventist Hospital, Washington, DC, USA
2 The Benetti Institute, Buenos Aires, Argentina
ABSTRACT
Background: Coronary bypass surgery on the beating heart has been in existence since the inception of coronary revascularization. The advent and evolution of the heart-lung machine and cardioplegia have greatly advanced and expanded the realm of bypass surgery, allowing surgeons to perform precise coronary anastomoses in a still field of the arrested heart. The minimally invasive direct coronary artery bypass (MIDCAB) has been used primarily for grafting the left internal mammary artery (LIMA) to left anterior descending artery (LAD) and is gaining acceptance as a less invasive option. Dr. Frederico Benetti in Argentina championed the resurgence of beating heart surgery in 1985, and pioneered the left anterior thoracotomy MIDCAB procedure, which he has further refined to a xiphoid approach. The xiphoid incision is a simpler, less painful approach than that through a left anterior thoracotomy.
Methods: An incision is made through the xiphoid and, if necessary, into the tip of the sternum allowing the left side of the chest to be elevated. The distal LIMA is identified and dissected proximally to about the third interspace to give enough distance for a tensionless anastomosis. The pericardium is opened and the heart positioned to expose the LAD. Local stabilization for the LAD is obtained and the LIMA-to-LAD anastomosis is performed.
Results: The xiphoid MIDCAB approach was used for LIMA-to-LAD anastomosis in ten patients ranging in age from 52 to 86 years (mean age 73 years). Three patients underwent angioplasty of additionally obstructed vessels (so-called hybrid procedures) following initial MIDCAB. Despite high preoperative-risk profiles and Parsonnet scores, there were no deaths. However, two of the three hybrid patients had major complications resulting in a prolonged hospital stay.
Conclusions: Initial clinical experience with xiphoid MIDCAB proves it is a feasible alternative to intercostal MIDCAB with the possible advantages of reduced pain and chest wall complications. Further investigation into this surgical approach is warranted.
AUTHOR/ARTICLE INFORMATION
Reprint requests to: Mercedes K.C. Dullum, MD, Cardiovascular and Thoracic Surgery Associates, 106 Irving St., N.W., Suite 308S, Washington, D.C., 20010-2927
Presented at the second annual NewEra Cardiac Care conference, Scottsdale, AZ, January 8-10, 1999.
Submitted on: March 4, 1999
|
|
