JOURNAL

Home
Journal
Now in Medline / Index Medicus & ISI



Subscribe
Search
Discussion Forums
Join
Multimedia
Meeting Highlights
Lecture Presentations
Surgical Video Library
Audio Interviews
Resources
Medline
Learning Center
Meetings
For Authors
Editorial Board
Partners


21st World Congress of the World Society of Cardio-Thoracic Surgeons


Vacuum-Assisted Venous Drainage does not Increase the Neurological Risk

(#2001-18959 ... October 29, 2001)

Michel Carrier, MD,1 André Cyr, BSc,2 Pierre Voisine, MD,1 Michel Pellerin, MD,1 Louis P. Perrault, MD, PhD,1 Raymond Cartier, MD,1 Pierre Pagé, MD,1 Yves Hébert, MD,1 Denis Bouchard, MD,1 Nancy Poirier MD1

1Department of Surgery, Montreal Heart Institute, and University of Montreal, Montreal, Quebec, Canada
2Service of Perfusion, Montreal Heart Institute, Montreal, Quebec, Canada


ABSTRACT

Background: Vacuum-assisted venous drainage (VAVD) with negative pressure applied to integral sealed-hardshell venous reservoir facilitates valvular surgery through minimally invasive approaches. Despite concerns regarding air entrainment from the right atrium, cerebral microemboli of air and neurological complications, VAVD was used in patients who underwent valvular surgery throughout the last two years in our institution.

Methods: We compared the rate of neurological complications in patients who underwent surgery with and without VAVD from June 1997 to July 2001. VAVD was added to solid venous reservoirs with membrane oxygenators and arterial filters. Clinical results were prospectively entered in our valve database and were used for the analysis.

Results: Eight hundred twenty-two consecutive patients averaging 65 ± 11 years of age underwent aortic, mitral and tricuspid valve replacements including 40 redos (40/822, 5%) and 265 associated CABG (265/822, 32%) with VAVD in 1999 to 2001 compared to 723 patients averaging 63 ± 11 years of age (p = 0.01) who underwent the same procedures with 79 redos (79/723, 11%) and 177 CABG (177/723, 24%) without VAVD in 1997 to 1999. CPB time averaged 117 ± 50 minutes in VAVD patients compared to 108 ± 43 minutes in those without VAVD (p = 0.001). Thirty-day mortality averaged 5% (39/822) in patients with VAVD and 4% (30/723) in those without VAVD (p = 0.6). Seven patients of the VAVD group (7/822, 1%) and 11 patients without VAVD (11/723, 1.5%, p = 0.2) suffered from temporary or permanent neurological deficit.

Conclusion: VAVD is a useful adjunct to modern cardiopulmonary bypass systems. When used with appropriate care, VAVD does not appear to significantly increase air microemboli and is not associated with an increased neurological risk following valvular surgery.


pdficon.gif:
Click here for a PDF
version of the full article.

(Subscribers Only)

 


ISSN#: 1522-6662
Copyright 2011 Forum Multimedia Publishing, LLC. All rights reserved.

The material available at this site is for educational purposes only and is NOT intended for any diagnostic, clinically related, or other purpose. Forum Multimedia Publishing, LLC, assumes no responsibility for any use or misuse of this material and makes no warranty or representation of any kind with respect to the material available at this site.