|
 |

Vacuum-Assisted Venous Drainage does not Increase the Neurological Risk
(#2001-18959 ... October 29, 2001)
Michel Carrier, MD,1 André Cyr,
BSc,2 Pierre Voisine, MD,1 Michel Pellerin,
MD,1 Louis P. Perrault, MD, PhD,1 Raymond Cartier,
MD,1 Pierre Pagé, MD,1 Yves
Hébert, MD,1 Denis Bouchard, MD,1 Nancy Poirier
MD1
1Department of Surgery, Montreal Heart Institute, and University of Montreal, Montreal, Quebec, Canada
2Service of Perfusion, Montreal Heart Institute, Montreal, Quebec, Canada
ABSTRACT
Background: Vacuum-assisted venous drainage (VAVD)
with negative pressure applied to integral sealed-hardshell
venous reservoir facilitates valvular surgery through minimally
invasive approaches. Despite concerns regarding air
entrainment from the right atrium, cerebral microemboli of
air and neurological complications, VAVD was used in
patients who underwent valvular surgery throughout the last
two years in our institution.
Methods: We compared the rate of neurological complications
in patients who underwent surgery with and without
VAVD from June 1997 to July 2001. VAVD was added to
solid venous reservoirs with membrane oxygenators and arterial
filters. Clinical results were prospectively entered in our
valve database and were used for the analysis.
Results: Eight hundred twenty-two consecutive patients
averaging 65 ± 11 years of age underwent aortic, mitral and
tricuspid valve replacements including 40 redos (40/822, 5%)
and 265 associated CABG (265/822, 32%) with VAVD in
1999 to 2001 compared to 723 patients averaging 63 ± 11
years of age (p = 0.01) who underwent the same procedures
with 79 redos (79/723, 11%) and 177 CABG (177/723, 24%)
without VAVD in 1997 to 1999. CPB time averaged 117 ± 50
minutes in VAVD patients compared to 108 ± 43 minutes in
those without VAVD (p = 0.001). Thirty-day mortality averaged
5% (39/822) in patients with VAVD and 4% (30/723) in
those without VAVD (p = 0.6). Seven patients of the VAVD
group (7/822, 1%) and 11 patients without VAVD (11/723,
1.5%, p = 0.2) suffered from temporary or permanent neurological
deficit.
Conclusion: VAVD is a useful adjunct to modern cardiopulmonary
bypass systems. When used with appropriate
care, VAVD does not appear to significantly increase air
microemboli and is not associated with an increased neurological
risk following valvular surgery.
 Click here for a PDF version of the full article. (Subscribers Only)
|
 |