Using the STS and Multinational Cardiac Surgical Databases to Establish Risk-Adjusted Benchmarks for Clinical Outcomes

(#2002-14840 ... May 22, 2002)

Richard K.H. Wyse, MD, Kenneth M. Taylor, MD

Department of Cardiac Surgery, Hammersmith Hospital, London, UK

ABSTRACT

One of the purposes of collecting data on cardiac surgical procedures, at a national level is to enable individual surgeons to improve quality and benchmark their own practice by making more accurate prospective prediction of outcome of each individual patient by using risk stratification based on previous local and national experiences. The past decade has seen a dramatic increase in the development of national cardiac surgical initiatives in many countries around the world. The size and extent of these databases has successfully allowed their use for patient risk stratification and preoperative risk modeling in four main aspects: patient selection and informed consent, coherent analysis of the determinants of patient outcomes, rationalizing unit management, and negotiations with external agencies.

Approximately 610 cardiac surgical units presently contribute their patient data, containing pre-operative risk factors, to centralized national registries. There are currently nine different datasets used throughout the world to collect patient information. To harmonize the considerable diversity among these source materials, an International Dataset has been developed by a collaborative process among more than 50 cardiac surgeons around the world. Constructed around the Society of Thoracic Surgeons (STS) data format, the International Dataset brings in key elements from all the other datasets, allowing the sharing of data and cross-analysis, thus greatly expanding the pool of patients, and national sources, from which risk-stratified outcomes can now be analyzed and unified.

Unlike the STS dataset, the International Dataset incorporates EuroSCORE, a simple-to-use, validated patient risk stratification system, which has been rapidly adopted by large numbers of centers around the world for patient risk stratification, outcomes assessment, and improving patient informed consent.

There are several benefits to collecting and centralizing national and international data: (1) understanding and defining basic demographics of patients undergoing cardiac surgery; (2) patient risk stratification and risk prediction at both a national and center-by-center level; (3) unit benchmarking, and development of effective nationally oriented and center-oriented quality improvement programs; (4) understanding and rationalizing resource utilization; and (5) use of data to leverage governments and other healthcare providers to affect policy.

Cardiac surgical registries will soon attempt to track patients for longer follow-up periods after discharge in order to identify surgery-related deaths for more extended periods of time following surgery, thereby improving the monitoring and prediction of patient outcomes.

Click here for a PDF
version of the full article.
(Subscribers Only)