JOURNAL

Home
Journal
Now in Medline / Index Medicus & ISI



Subscribe
Search
Discussion Forums
Join
Multimedia
Meeting Highlights
Lecture Presentations
Surgical Video Library
Audio Interviews
Resources
Medline
Learning Center
Meetings
For Authors
Editorial Board
Partners


21st World Congress of the World Society of Cardio-Thoracic Surgeons


Continuous Graft Perfusion: Optimizing the Quality of Saphenous Vein Grafts

(#2001-6755 ... June 27, 2001)

Peter Lamm, MD,1 Gerd Juchem, MD, 1 Stefan Milz, MD, 2 Bruno Reichart, MD1

1Department of Cardiac Surgery, 2Department of Anatomy,
Ludwig-Maximilians-Universit...t M∞nchen, Munich, Germany

Presented at the Fourth Annual Scientific Meeting of the International Society for Minimally Invasive Cardiac Surgery, June 27-30, 2001, Munich, Germany.


ABSTRACT

Background: Healthy unaltered vascular endothelium in graft material is a prerequisite for a successful CABG operation. Damage done to the endothelium during vein harvest is responsible for an early graft occlusion rate of 20% in the first year after operation. Minimally invasive vein harvesting is regarded to minimize the damage done to the Endothelium. We compared minimally invasive vein harvesting with conventional vein harvesting and studied the influence of a continuous perfusion of the veins with patient autologous blood on their endothelial integrity.

Methods: 80 patients were randomly split into 4 groups: Group 1: Conventional vein harvest and storage of the vein in a crystalloid solution before usage. Group 2: Endoscopic vein harvest and storage in cristallloid solution. Group 3: Conventional harvest under continuous perfusion of the vein with 100 ml blood via the heart lung machine. Group 4: Endoscopic vein harvest under continuous perfusion. Immediately prior to the first peripheral anastomosis a sample was taken from each graft and evaluated by scanning electron microscopy. The endothelial integrity was rated in 5 categories (from "completely confluent endothelium" (1) to "no endothelium" (5)).

Results:

Group 1: 2.7±1.13
Group 2: 2.2±1.06
Group 3: 1.6±0.68
Group 4: 1.6±0.69

Conclusion: In regard to the endothelial integrity endoscopic vein harvesting is superior to conventional vein harvest. If the grafts are harvested while continuously perfused with blood there is no more difference between the groups. Considering the well known additional benefits such as reduction in wound healing disorders endoscopic vein harvesting appears to be the preferable technique.


pdficon.gif:
Click here for a PDF
version of the full article.

(Subscribers Only)

 


ISSN#: 1522-6662
Copyright 2011 Forum Multimedia Publishing, LLC. All rights reserved.

The material available at this site is for educational purposes only and is NOT intended for any diagnostic, clinically related, or other purpose. Forum Multimedia Publishing, LLC, assumes no responsibility for any use or misuse of this material and makes no warranty or representation of any kind with respect to the material available at this site.