|
 |

Beating Heart Surgery Reduces Mortality in the Reoperative Bypass
Patient
(#2001-6935 ... June 27, 2001)
Todd M. Dewey, MD, Mitchell J. Magee, MD, Tea Acuff, MD, Syma Prince,
RN, Morley Herbert, PhD, James R. Edgerton, MD, Michael J. Mack. MD
Cardiopulmonary Research Science and Technology Institute, Dallas, Texas
Presented at the Fourth Scientific Meeting of the International Society
for Minimally Invasive Cardiac Surgery, June 27-30, 2001, Munich,
Germany
ABSTRACT
Background: Reoperative coronary artery bypass grafting (redo-CABG) has
an increased operative morbidity and mortality compared to patients
undergoing primary revascularization. In an effort to reduce the hazards
of reoperative CABG, we commenced revascularizing selected patients
without cardiopulmonary bypass (CPB) as an alternative to conventional
approaches.
Methods: From January 1998 to Dec. 2000, 432 patients underwent
reoperative CABG, 153 patients (35%) without the aid of CPB. Treatment
groups were compared by means of univariate analysis for preoperative
risk factors and postoperative complications. Predicted risk and
risk-adjusted mortality were determined by the Society of Thoracic
Surgeons risk algorithm.
Results: There was a significant difference in the preoperative
predicted risk scores between the two treatment groups (off pump 6.5%
vs. on pump 5.4%, p=0.0343). There was a significant difference in the
off pump observed mortality (2.61%) versus the on pump group (9.68%,
p=0.0065). Decreased morbidity in the off pump group was evidenced by a
reduced need for blood products (25% vs. 67%, p<0.0001), and the
incidence of prolonged ventilation (4% vs. 14%, p=0.0032). The off pump
group also had shorter hospital stays (6.2 ± 5.96 days vs. 8.0 ± 7.82,
p=0.0091). No significant differences between the two groups were seen
in the prevalence of perioperative myocardial infarction, stroke, renal
failure, or reoperation for bleeding.
Conclusion: Bypass grafting without CPB significantly decreases
mortality and morbidity in selected reoperative patients, and should be
considered a viable alternative to conventional approaches.

Click here for a PDF version of the full
article. (Subscribers Only)
|
 |