JOURNAL

Home
Journal
Now in Medline / Index Medicus & ISI



Subscribe
Search
Discussion Forums
Join
Multimedia
Meeting Highlights
Lecture Presentations
Surgical Video Library
Private Lecture Series
Audio Interviews
Resources
Medline
Learning Center
Meetings
For Authors
Editorial Board
Sponsors

Outcomes: The Key West Meeting


World Society of Cardio-Thoracic Surgeons


5th Congress Update in Cardiology and Cardiovascular Surgery
Sept. 24 - 28, 2009


The Heart Surgery Forum, Volume 6, Issue 6

A Novel Custom-Made Long Shunt Simplifies the Performance and Improves the Results of Beating-Heart Surgery

(#2003-612938 . . . August 28, 2003)

Donald E. Ross

Royal North Shore Hospital, Sydney, Australia

movie.GIF: View supplemental Quicktime movie: Movie 1 (9.2 MB)


ABSTRACT

Background: The occurrence of a snare-related stenosis after beating-heart surgery prompted the search for an alternative method of hemostasis. Because of the shortcomings of commercial coronary shunts a novel custom-made coronary shunting technique was devised. It involves the use of varying lengths of 1.2-mm Silastic tubing secured with a fine silk "tag" suture. The technique of construction and deployment of the shunts is presented. A retrospective comparison of 500 off-pump coronary artery bypass graft (OPCAB) cases done with snares was made with 300 cases using custommade long shunts (CLS).

Method: Between June 1998 and December 2000, 500 OPCAB surgeries were done using the Platypus stabilizer and Silastic snares for hemostasis. Thereafter, 300 surgeries were done with the same stabilizer but using CLS instead of snares.

Results: The CLS group had a perioperative infarction incidence of 1.6% compared with 4.4% in the snare group. Other measured parameters remained unchanged, but there was a profound, but subjectively noted, reduction in the incidence of hemodynamic instability in the shunted cases.

Conclusion: The best method for control of coronary bleeding during beating-heart surgery remains controversial. There is increasing evidence that snares can cause artery damage and spasm. Shunting avoids this problem while enhancing hemodynamic stability and facilitating accurate anastomoses. The case against shunts is based mainly on inconvenience but this problem has been substantially negated by the introduction of the CLS technique.


pdficon.gif:
Click here for a PDF
version of the full article.

(Subscribers Only)

 


ISSN#: 1522-6662
Copyright 2009 Forum Multimedia Publishing, LLC. All rights reserved.

The material available at this site is for educational purposes only and is NOT intended for any diagnostic, clinically related, or other purpose. Forum Multimedia Publishing, LLC, assumes no responsibility for any use or misuse of this material and makes no warranty or representation of any kind with respect to the material available at this site.